OTW Represents Vidders And Other Remix Artists at DMCA Anticircumvention Hearings

OTW Board members Rebecca Tushnet (Chair of Legal) and Francesca Coppa (Chair of Communications and Vidding History) as well as TWC review editor Tisha Turk went down to Washington DC on May 7, 2009 to testify at the DMCA Hearings on Noncommercial Remix.

Rule 1201 of Copyright Law prevents the circumvention of copyright protection systems (e.g. makes it illegal to rip DVDs or to hack your cellphone) but also requires the U.S. Copyright Office to hold hearings every three years to find out of this prohibition is adversely affecting anyone. In 2006, the Copyright Office granted an exemption to film studies professors, because the case was made that these professors need to rip DVDs to make high quality clip compilations to teach their classes. This year, there were a number of new proposed exemptions, including: educators beyond film studies professors (including K-12 teachers), documentary filmmakers, and vidders and other non-commercial remix artists.

The OTW previously submitted a reply comment in support of the Electronic Freedom Frontier’s (EFF) proposed exemption for vidders and other remix artists. Tushnet, Coppa, and Turk went down to support this comment with live testimony. As you might have seen across the internet, the other side—MPAA, studios, the people who make encryption technology, etc.—suggested that instead of ripping, professors, remixers, documentary filmmakers and others make clips by filming a flat screen with a camcorder.

For More Information

Announcement, Legal Advocacy, Vidding
  1. Betty commented:

    Wow. Really? Video-tape a tv screen. That’s the most insultingly stupid and dismissive counter-offer I’ve heard since the Prop 8 crew was out in force.

  2. scribblesinink commented:

    make clips by filming a flat screen with a camcorder.

    Are they for real?!? Please tell me they were joking… That’s about as dumb a suggestion as… as… I don’t know, believing that the Earth is flat?

  3. Dominic commented:

    Wow that’s backward. T

    hat’s like saying that books should be copied by hand rather than using a printing press so as not to inconvenience the scribes
    Or using the mail wagon instead of the telegraph so as not to inconvenience the horse owners.

  4. Sally commented:

    Here is some more information http://www.tubestime.com/watch/dmca-allows-ripping-dvds about DMCA rules and how they will affect you as a consumer. Well, I’m not surprised. This is the purpose of their existance to produce such rules which normal people wouldn’t like at all.